The harmony is for powder. Considering that your crimp goes to the wad column/hull your powder is not really cumbersome sufficient which allows the shot/wad column to set much too deep in the hull. Because you have extreme limitations with component availability from the 410 gauge its in all probability important to change powder so as to take care of the situation.
Thanks a great deal for responding to my query. I just lately bought a whole new Spolar. I didnt have this problem with my older Spolars.
All there powders can get you to definitely 1350fps in 410 no challenges (without even getting near to max Doing the job pressures), and since These are each incredibly near the same melt away choice of powders, it all arrives down which a person yow will discover the the very least costly alternatively.
If you're reloading within the 1200fps variety isntead, then your superior off Together with the #296 powder in its place (slightly more quickly melt away rate, so a rather greater melt away with the slower speeds/pressures instead). Hell, consider is 1 action farther, and In case you are during the 1200fps assortment in 410, better off with lil gun or 410 powder, due to the fact they have got a cleaner burn at these speeds, due to the fact they may have a higher Operating force at these speeds alternatively (burn inside the #294-#295 burn up variety isntead, and such powder burns to fast for getting you into the 1350fps range to start with because you will dancing/flirty with max Operating pressures isntead).
And Sure, I've used all 3 powders, and could drop flats of them on stations in mixes, and you simply would not manage to convey to which shell had what powder, since the speeds and patterns are so shut jointly on the 1350fps selection, there's no feasible variation in performance of your shells.
Winchester 296 and Hodgdon a hundred and ten are the identical powder with another label. You may get by just high-quality without the need of at any time weighing a shot charge or reaming a bushing; Pretty much not one person does possibly.
I can confirm from initial hand knowledge which the 13gr. load is effective similar to a charm with a load of three @ 0.395" balls; my loads were being plastic shells but I see no reason why it would not perform with total length metallic shells.
In this article, we’ll take a look at the Homes and purposes of Accurate 1680 Powder, and why it’s a leading choice for discerning marksmen.
The information exhibited on This web site, my blog like ballistic data, was derived from tightly controlled laboratory circumstances.
Hope this allows you out. I would be loading the H110 powder for your newer HS hulls. You have to use the Earn HS wad and Stick to the loading data to your letter. Quite high chamber pressures in 28 ga. and also the 410 ga. so Do not change primers or wads with identical powder loads like you can inside the twelve ga. Doing this can put you over the top with chamber pressures. Excellent Luck and Split-em all. Jeff
Now let me get it action farther since you are popping out of H110/296 and going into 410 powder. You will burn up up hulls in a considerably quicker fee, and may not even similar to the 410 loads when It can be all explained linked here and completed (inconsistency).
This can be an older thread, you may not get a reaction, and could be reviving an outdated thread. Remember to consider creating a new thread.
They can be telling it like it reall is. Inside the 410, there isn't any better propellant than H110/W296. It can get you the highest velocities, with pressures within rationale which is far a lot easier on situations than other powders and Alliant 410 is especially tricky on AA HS situations.